There has been a lot of talk lately about what books are assigned for school reading and what books kids should be reading. A lot of talk got stirred up with
this article For an awesome response to that article read
this fantastic blog post.
The basic complaint of the original NPR piece really struck a chord with me. A negative chord. (As it did with many readers. You'll see if you read the comments following the article).
While the piece is talking about high school kids (and I agree with those who debate that many books are often much more complex than a simple analysis of sentence length and word complexity would suggest), there still seems to be a basic assumption in the article that it is good for kids to be reading challenging books (which I agree with) and bad for kids to be reading easy books (which I disagree with).
This assumption about easy books being a negative exists many other places as well. I often hear people complaining about younger kids' book choices in much the same way.
A child brings a book up to a grown up. "Oh no," says the parent or the teacher. "That one's too easy. Choose something harder." of "for your age." or "at your level."
Now I am a huge fan of pairing kids with "just right books". But "easy books" have a place too. A really important place in my opinion.
Here are just a few ways that easy books can help young readers (and older readers too):